Skip to content
Was It Causal?

Context · Business model

B2C subscription

Recurring revenue moves the question from acquisition to retained value, and makes pull-forward the main way a good result turns out to be nothing.

What changes here

The same four questions, and what each one runs into in this context.

Attribution

Trial starts are easy to attribute and are not the outcome. Credit assigned at signup says nothing about month three.

Incrementality

Pull-forward looks like lift in a short window and disappears in a long one. The test window has to outlast the natural purchase cycle.

Allocation

Payback period and contribution margin matter more than CAC. A cheap subscriber who churns at month two is a loss.

Decisioning

Churn models find who leaves, not who can be kept. Uplift is the only honest target for retention spend.

Written for this context

Incrementality

  • Planned

    Triangulating When Your Evidence Disagrees

    An experiment, an MMM, and attribution give three different answers. A structured way to reconcile them without averaging away the information.

Allocation

  • Planned

    Adstock, Saturation, and Honest Response Curves

    Lagged effects and diminishing returns are where most mix models smuggle in their conclusions. How to tell a fitted curve from an identified one.

  • Planned

    What a Marketing Mix Model Can and Cannot Do

    MMM is a good allocation tool and a weak causal one. What it needs to be trustworthy, and why Bayesian priors do not create identification.

Decisioning

Systems