Skip to content
Was It Causal?

Context · Growth motion

Marketing-led

Marketing owns the journey from awareness through to conversion.

What changes here

The same four questions, and what each one runs into in this context.

Attribution

The assumptions built into most attribution tools fit here better than anywhere else, which makes overconfidence easy.

Incrementality

The cleanest place to run holdouts, because marketing controls the intervention end to end.

Allocation

Channel mix is the main lever, so mix modelling and marginal return analysis earn their cost.

Decisioning

The optimisation event is a marketing choice, and it is usually set too shallow.

Written for this context

Attribution

Incrementality

Allocation

  • Planned

    Adstock, Saturation, and Honest Response Curves

    Lagged effects and diminishing returns are where most mix models smuggle in their conclusions. How to tell a fitted curve from an identified one.

  • Planned

    Calibrating an MMM to Experiments

    The practical bridge between slow causal evidence and fast allocation models: using experimental estimates as priors and as validation.

  • Planned

    Marginal Return, Not Average Return

    The channel with the best historical ROI is frequently the one closest to saturation. Why budget decisions need the slope, not the level.

  • Planned

    Paid Search and SEO Are Not Independent

    Branded paid search often captures demand that organic would have captured anyway. Designing the test that measures total branded conversions rather than paid ones.

  • Planned

    What a Marketing Mix Model Can and Cannot Do

    MMM is a good allocation tool and a weak causal one. What it needs to be trustworthy, and why Bayesian priors do not create identification.

  • Worked example Planned

    An Experiment-Calibrated Marketing Mix Model

    Baseline, adstock, saturation, and controls, validated against holdout estimates and used to produce a constrained budget allocation with stated uncertainty.

Systems